Explore Sources
A database of excerpts from ancient documents that
retell the story of the Nephilim & the ‘sons of God’.
BEFORE CHRIST
Excerpts from ancient documents pre-dating Christ…
FIRST CENTURY
Jewish philosophers, historians, and New Testament authors referring to the Genesis 6 story during the first century AD.
EARLY CHURCH
Early church fathers and others who reference and comment on the story of disobedient angels and their sons before the flood.
MEDIEVAL WRITERS
Your Title Goes Here
Your content goes here. Edit or remove this text inline or in the module Content settings. You can also style every aspect of this content in the module Design settings and even apply custom CSS to this text in the module Advanced settings.
Procopius of Gaza | Sethite View | 465 to 528 AD
It is also written ‘Angels of God’. Some say that this is said about fallen powers; the mingling of angels with women, however, is impossible and against nature… Scripture calls the chosen race ‘angels’ or ‘sons of God’, namely the ones who originated from Seth and Enosh, and they are called such because of their holiness.
Procopius of Gaza
Book of the Cave of Treasures | Sethite View | c. 600 AD
And the sons of Seth had intercourse with the daughters of Cain; and they conceived by them and brought forth mighty men, the sons of heroes, like towers,
Hence early writers have erred and written, “The angels came down from heaven, and had intercourse with mankind, and from them were born mighty men of renown,”
But this is not true; they have said this because they did not understand,
Now see, my brother readers, and know that this is neither in the nature of spiritual beings, nor in the nature of the impure and evil-doing demons who love adultery;
for there are no males nor females among them, nor has there been even one added to their number since they fell. If the devils were able to have intercourse with women, they would not leave one single virgin undefiled in the whole human race.
Book of the Cave of Treasures 18
George Syncellus | c. 800 AD
Interesting because he retells both the Sethite intepretation AND the angelic one in great details. Basically quoting the book of Enoch in detail and ascribing it to Enoch.
Here is the full text of the Chronology but in Latin and Greek.
https://archive.org/stream/georgiussyncell01nikgoog/georgiussyncell01nikgoog_djvu.txt
Al Tabari | Angel View | c. 839 - 923 AD
The angels were astonished at the acts of disobedience committed by the human beings on earth, claiming they would do better than them.
Therefore, God challenged the angels to choose two representatives among them, who would descend to earth and be endowed with bodily desires.
During their stay on earth, they fell in love with a woman named Zohra (often identified with Venus). She told them she would become intimate with them if they joined her in idolatry and tell her how to ascend to heaven.
The angels refused and remained pious.
Later they met her again and the woman this time stated she would become intimate with them if they drank alcohol. The angels thought that alcohol could not cause great harm and therefore, they accepted the condition.
After they were drunk, they became intimate with her and after noticing a witness, they killed them.
On the next day, Harut and Marut regretted their deeds but could not ascend to heaven anymore due to their sins, as their link to the angels was broken.
Thereupon, God asked them, either their punishment shall be in this world or in the hereafter. They chose to be punished on earth and therefore were sent to Babel as a test, teaching humans magic but not without warning them that they were just a temptation.
DIG DEEPER
Learn more about these writers and what they wrote. Understanding why they wrote what they did is key to finding reliable answers to giant questions.
Tucker Carlson, Fr. Stephen De Young, and the Genesis 6 Nephilim Claim
https://youtu.be/5x9vR5sKHFI?si=WC1peV4Es2B9SITg At the center of Tucker Carlson’s viral Nephilim interview with Fr. Stephen De Young is a sweeping interpretation of Genesis 6. In this reconstruction, rebellious heavenly beings joined themselves to human women and...
Darrin K. Schick
Darrin K. Schick’s 2024 paper “Evil Spirits And Demons: An In Depth Look At Why The Book Of Enoch Should Be Questioned” argues that 1 Enoch is a late, pseudepigraphal, non-canonical text that should never be used to build Christian doctrine—especially about demons, evil spirits, and the Nephilim in Genesis 6:1–4—and that Jude’s use of Enochic material does not change that. The paper is worth reading because it sharpens key questions about canon, authorship, and the limits of using Second Temple literature for interpreting Genesis 6.
Nephilim, Science, and Scripture: Responding to NCSE on Biblical Giants
In “It Ain’t Necessarily So: Giants and Biblical Literalism,” published by the National Center for Science Education (NCSE) in 1985, J.R. Cole takes aim at a certain kind of “biblical literalism” that uses giants to attack evolution. The NCSE exists to defend the...






























