Explore Sources

Short Excerpt: "Of the incorporeal beings, only angels fell away, and not all of them, but some only, that inclined to things below and set their desire on things of earth, withdrawing themselves from their relations with things above, even from God."

According to Nemesius of Emesa, a fourth century Christian philosopher, only certain angels, rather than all incorporeal beings, deviated from their celestial nature and succumbed to earthly desires. These fallen angels, driven by their inclination towards worldly matters, engaged in intermarriage with humans, thus leading to the intriguing phenomenon mentioned in the sacred text.

Nemesius referred to the story as historical without indicating much controversy. Even if other church leaders were adopting a more human identity of the ‘sons of God’ in Genesis 6 by this time, Nemesius is still referring to the story as was largely understood by earlier church fathers.

Short Excerpt: “‘When men multiplied on the earth, the angels of heaven came together with the daughters of men.’

In some copies I found “the sons of God”. What is meant by the Spirit, in my opinion, is that the descendants of Seth are called the sons of God on account of the righteous men and patriarchs who have sprung from him, even down to the Saviour Himself; but that the descendants of Cain are named the seed of men, as having nothing divine in them, on account of the wickedness of their race and the inequality of their nature, being a mixed people, and having stirred the indignation of God.

But if it is thought that these refer to angels, we must take them to be those who deal with magic and jugglery, who taught the women the motions of the stars and the knowledge of things celestial, by whose power they conceived the giants as their children, by whom wickedness came to its height on the earth, until God decreed that the whole race of the living should perish in their impiety by the deluge.”

Explore why Julius Africanus viewed the "sons of God" as the descendants of Seth instead of the view that up until then had been more commonly accepted.

Africanus was one of the first to suggest that the "sons of God" referred to the descendants of Seth, rather than supernatural beings.

According to Africanus, the ‘sons of God’ denoted the righteous men and patriarchs who descended from Seth, culminating in the Savior Himself. On the contrary, the descendants of Cain were the "seed of men," signifying their lack of divine connection due to the wickedness within their lineage.

He doesn’t fully discount the idea that the ‘sons of God’ may be angels, and says that if they were, then the proliferation of wickedness attributed to these events ultimately led to God's decision to bring forth the great flood, cleansing the earth of impiety.

Short Excerpt: “From Adam Seth was born, who was the third after Abel, and from Seth Enosh was born.

He hoped to be called the Lord and God. Therefore the children born from him bear the name ‘sons of God’, just like we also from the name of the master Christ are called Christians.

The race of Seth was segregated and not mixed with the race of Cain because of the curse which was laid on him by the God of the universe.

But later, when they observed how beautiful the daughters of Cain’s family were, they became enchanted and took them for themselves as wives, thus ruining their ancestral nobility.”

Explore St. Athanasius of Alexandria's interpretation of Genesis 6:1-4, focusing on the intermarriage between the righteous Sethites and the descendants of Cain. Athanasius, besides being a theological defender, delved into biblical exegesis, providing interpretations on various passages, including Genesis 6:1-4. He argued that the "sons of God" mentioned in this passage were not supernatural beings but the descendants of Seth, who were considered righteous. This view aligns with scholars like Julius Africanus and Ephrem the Syrian.

Short Excerpt: "For of the spirits who inhabit the heaven, the angels who dwell in the lowest region, being grieved at the ingratitude of men to God, asked that they might come into the life of men, that, really becoming men, by more intercourse they might convict those who had acted ungratefully towards Him, and might subject every one to adequate punishment...

But when, having assumed these forms, they convicted as covetous those who stole them, and changed themselves into the nature of men, in order that, living holily, and showing the possibility of so living, they might subject the ungrateful to punishment, yet having become in all respects men, they also partook of human lust, and being brought under its subjection they fell into cohabitation with women; and being involved with them, and sunk into defilement and altogether emptied of their power, were unable to turn back to the first purity of their proper nature, their members turned away from their fiery substance: for the fire itself, being exhausted by the weight of lust, and changed into flesh, they trode the impious path downward. For they themselves, being fettered with bonds of flesh, were constrained and strongly bound; wherefore they have no more been able to ascend into the heavens... "

Delve into Clement of Rome's perspective on Genesis 6:1-4 and uncover his intriguing interpretation of this ancient biblical passage.

He presents a narrative where heavenly spirits, residing in the lowest region of heaven, became disheartened by humanity's ingratitude towards God. Seeking to convict the ungrateful, these spirits requested to dwell among humans, assuming human form and exposing the covetousness of those who stole their forms.

However, as these heavenly beings inhabited human bodies, they were not immune to human desires. They succumbed to lust and engaged in relationships with human women, resulting in a state of defilement and powerlessness. Their celestial essence was diminished, and they could no longer ascend to the heavens. Bound by the constraints of their earthly bodies, they lost their initial purity and descended into a path of impurity.

Short Excerpt: “When, therefore, the number of men had begun to increase, God in His forethought, lest the devil, to whom from the beginning He had given power over the earth, should by his subtlety either corrupt or destroy men, as he had done at first, sent angels for the protection and improvement of the human race; and inasmuch as He had given these a free will, He enjoined them above all things not to defile themselves with contamination from the earth, and thus lose the dignity of their heavenly nature.

He plainly prohibited them from doing that which He knew that they would do, that they might entertain no hope of pardon.

Therefore, while they abode among men, that most deceitful ruler of the earth, by his very association, gradually enticed them to vices, and polluted them by intercourse with women. Then, not being admitted into heaven on account of the sins into which they had plunged themselves, they fell to the earth.“

In his writings, Lactantius expounds on his understanding of Genesis 6:1-4. He believed that when the population of humanity began to increase, God, in His forethought, sent angels to protect and guide mankind. However, these angels, gifted with free will, succumbed to the enticement of earthly pleasures, defiling themselves by mingling with human women. As a result, they fell from their heavenly state and were denied entry into heaven due to their transgressions.

Short Excerpt: "And this argument is still further confirmed by Plutarch, in the passage where he says that the mythical narratives told as concerning gods are certain tales about daemons, and the deeds of Giants and Titans celebrated in song among the Greeks are also stories about daemons, intended to suggest a new phase of thought. Of this kind then perhaps were the statements in the Sacred Scripture concerning the giants before the Mood[flood], and those concerning their progenitors, of whom it is said, 'And when the angels of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair, they took unto them wives of all that they chose,' and of these were born 'the giants the men of renown which were of old.'

For one might say that these daemons are those giants, and that their spirits have been deified by the subsequent generations of men, and that their battles, and their quarrels among themselves, and their wars are the subjects of these legends that are told as of gods. Plutarch indeed, in the discourse which he composed On Isis and the gods of the Egyptians, speaks as follows word for word:

'THEY therefore do better who think that the incidents recorded concerning Typhon and Osiris and Isis refer to sufferings neither of gods nor of men, but of certain mighty daemons... For various degrees of virtue and vice are found in daemons just as in men.’
"

Eusebius of Caesarea, a respected Christian historian, offered unique insights into the mysterious passage of Genesis 6:1-4. Discover his interpretation of the Nephilim, the sons of God, and their connections to angels and ancient mythologies. Explore the thought-provoking perspectives that shed light on this enigmatic biblical narrative.

Short Excerpt: When Almighty God, to beautify the nature of the world, willed that that earth should be visited by angels, when they were sent down they despised His laws. Such was the beauty of women, that it turned them aside; so that, being contaminated, they could not return to heaven. Rebels from God, they uttered words against Him. Then the Highest uttered His judgment against them; and from their seed giants are said to have been born.

By them arts were made known in the earth, and they taught the dyeing of wool, and everything which is done; and to them, when they died, men erected images.

But the Almighty, because they were of an evil seed, did not approve that, when dead, they should be brought back from death. Whence wandering they now subvert many bodies, and it is such as these especially that ye this day worship and pray to as gods.

Explore the interpretation of this ancient Christian poet regarding the union of angels and humans, the birth of giants, and the worship of idols. Discover his perspective on the historical events described in the passage and the influence of 2nd temple literature.

Commodianus believed that the intermarriages mentioned in Genesis 6:1-4 were a result of the actions of angels. In his writings, he stated, "When Almighty God, to beautify the nature of the world, willed that the earth should be visited by angels, when they were sent down, they despised His laws." According to his interpretation, these angels were sent by God to Earth, but they disobeyed divine laws, captivated by the beauty of human women.

Short Excerpt: “When by this time the human race had increased to a great multitude, certain angels, whose habitation was in heaven, were captivated by the appearance of some beautiful virgins, and cherished illicit desires after them, so much so, that falling beneath their own proper nature and origin, they left the higher regions of which they were inhabitants, and allied themselves in earthly marriages.

These angels gradually spreading wicked habits, corrupted the human family, and from their alliance giants are said to have sprung, for the mixture with them of beings of a different nature, as a matter of course, gave birth to monsters.

God being offended by these things, and especially by the wickedness of mankind, which had gone beyond measure, had determined to destroy the whole human race."

In Book 1 of the Sacred History, Sulpicius Severus discusses his interpretation of the Nephilim in Genesis 6:1-4. Like many other scholars of his time, he believed that the ‘sons of God’ were descendants of angels.

Severus posits that during a time when the human race had grown immensely, certain angels held illicit desires for mortal women. These desires pushed them to leave their heavenly abode and nature and marry humans.The angels tainted humanity. As they spread their influence across the world, the giants were born.

This growing sinfulness made God incredibly furious and urged him to destroy humankind all at once.

Short Excerpt: He called the sons of Seth sons of God, those who, like the sons of Seth, had been called “the righteous people of God . The beautiful daughters of men whom they saw were the daughters of Cain who adorned themselves and became a snare to the eyes of the sons of Seth.

Then Moses said, they took to wife such of them as they chose, because when they took them, they acted very haughtily over those whom they chose, A poor one would exalt himself over the wife of a rich man and an old man would sin with one who was young. The ugliest of all would act arrogantly over the most beautiful.

In Ephrem’s Commentary on Genesis, Ephrem draws attention to the intermarriages between the sons of God and the daughters of men. His perspective diverges with the more commonly recorded belief at his time, as well as presents a very unusual reason why Noah had kept his generations pure.

Short Excerpt: "Giants. In the Hebrew, it has the following: Falling ones (that is, annaphilim) were on the earth in those days. And after these things, when the sons of the gods used to go in to the daughters of men and breed with them, these were the mighty ones from the beginning, men called by name. Instead of falling ones or giants, Symmachus translated ‘violent ones’. The name falling ones is indeed fitting both for angels and for the offspring of holy ones."

[Jerome, Hebrew Question on Genesis]

Jerome presents this narrative as historical, providing no indications of controversy or doubt regarding his understanding. His insights align closely with Jewish tradition, and he incorporates allegorical and mystical subtleties reminiscent of the teachings of Philo and the Alexandrian school.

Short Excerpt: THE SONS OF GOD WENT IN TO THE DAUGHTERS OF MEN, AND THEY BROUGHT FORTH CHILDREN. — They also often ask how angels could have sex with the daughters of men, of whom the giants are said to have been born, although some manuscripts, not only Latin but also Greek, read not of the angels, but of the sons of God. To solve this question some have claimed that they were just men, and so it could also be said of them that they were angels. Scripture, for example, says about John, who was a man: Behold, I send my angel before you to prepare your way. (Mt. 11:10; Mk. 3:1) But the problem is knowing how giants were born through sex of men, or how they could be joined with women, if they were not men, but angels. With regard to the giants, that is to say, very large and very strong men, I think that there is nothing strange in that they could have been born of men, because even after the flood they existed; as a matter of fact, in our own day there have also been some individual humans incredibly large, not only men but also women. It is therefore more credible that righteous men, called angels, or sons of God, (Cf. Gen. 6:2) moved by lust, sinned with women, instead of angels, who could not commit that sin because they lack bodies; although certain demons have been evil with women, so many things are said and by so many people, that it is not easy to decide on an opinion on this question. [Question 3]

Augustine | Questions on Genesis Chapter 6

In Augustine's view, the 'sons of God' were likely the Sethites, righteous men who succumbed to lust and engaged in relationships with women. He rejected the idea that these 'sons of God' were fallen angels and, instead, supported the notion of them being human. Augustine also discussed the birth of giants resulting from these unions and found it credible that such extraordinary individuals existed in history.

Throughout his works, Augustine presents multiple perspectives and acknowledges the complexity of the topic, seemingly open to the possibility of angels being involved. While his insights on the Nephilim in Genesis were not the central focus of his writings, his contributions continue to be studied and debated by scholars today.